A small purple flower blooming through a crack in weathered concrete, symbolising resilience and hope emerging from difficult circumstances

When Every "No" Hurts More: Rejection Sensitivity Dysphoria and IVF

September 29, 202513 min read

Picture this: you're in the fertility clinic waiting room, clutching your little folder of results. The nurse breezes in with a brisk, "Your numbers aren't great this round." Rationally, you know this is just clinical feedback. But your chest tightens, your stomach drops, and suddenly it feels like you've been personally judged, dismissed, or found defective. You can't stop replaying the words all day.

If this sounds familiar, you might be bumping into something called Rejection Sensitivity Dysphoria (RSD). And IVF, unfortunately, is the perfect storm for it.

What Exactly Is Rejection Sensitivity Dysphoria?

Rejection Sensitivity Dysphoria (RSD) is an intense, overwhelming emotional response to perceived rejection, criticism, or failure. First coined by Dr. William Dodson, RSD represents a neurobiological phenomenon where the brain's threat-detection system becomes hyperactive to social cues¹. Research suggests it affects up to 99% of people with ADHD, though it can occur in anyone with heightened sensitivity to interpersonal feedback².

This isn't about being "too sensitive" or "taking things the wrong way." RSD lives in the nervous system, involving dysregulation in the brain's emotional processing centres, particularly the amygdala and prefrontal cortex³. The pain is neurologically real, brain imaging studies show that social rejection activates the same pain pathways as physical injury⁴.

RSD can manifest as:

  • Sudden waves of shame or self-blame

  • Emotional spirals that feel impossible to climb out of

  • Reliving conversations on a loop (rumination)

  • Withdrawing from people or, conversely, snapping at them

  • Physical symptoms like racing heart, nausea, or muscle tension

Why IVF Magnifies RSD

Fertility treatment creates what researchers call a "rejection-rich environment"⁵. Studies show that women undergoing IVF report significantly higher levels of perceived rejection and social isolation compared to the general population⁶. This makes biological sense: IVF involves repeated exposure to potential "failure" at every stage.

The IVF rejection cascade includes:

  • Medical rejection: Clinics evaluating your "numbers" (AMH, FSH, egg quality ratings)

  • Biological rejection: Cycles that fail despite perfect protocol adherence

  • Social rejection: The implicit message that your body isn't doing what it's "supposed to do"

  • Systemic rejection: Healthcare systems that often depersonalise the experience

Research by Greil and colleagues found that women with fertility challenges experience "biographical disruption" a fundamental questioning of their life narrative and identity⁷. For someone with RSD, this disruption can feel catastrophic rather than simply challenging.

Neurodivergent patients face additional layers of rejection:

  • Communication mismatches with medical providers who may not recognise neurodivergent communication styles⁸

  • Sensory overwhelm in clinical environments

  • Executive function challenges in navigating complex treatment protocols

  • Masking behaviours that drain emotional resources needed for treatment resilience

The Hidden Toll of RSD in Fertility Treatment

Emotional Impact

IVF already increases rates of anxiety and depression, with studies showing 23-60% of women experiencing clinically significant distress⁹. When RSD amplifies each setback, the emotional toll becomes exponentially greater. Research on rejection sensitivity shows it's linked to:

  • Increased rumination and catastrophic thinking¹⁰

  • Higher rates of treatment discontinuation¹¹

  • Greater risk of developing secondary trauma from medical experiences¹²

Relational Consequences

Partners and family may struggle to understand why seemingly "minor" medical feedback triggers such intense reactions. Studies on couples in fertility treatment show that emotional dysregulation in one partner significantly impacts relationship satisfaction and treatment adherence¹³. RSD can create a cycle where:

  • Intense emotional reactions push loved ones away

  • Perceived rejection from loved ones intensifies RSD symptoms

  • Isolation increases, reducing available support during treatment

Practical Barriers

Fear of rejection can create significant barriers to effective self-advocacy. Research shows that patients with high rejection sensitivity are less likely to:

  • Seek second opinions when recommended¹⁴

  • Request accommodations for disabilities or sensory needs¹⁵

  • Participate in support groups or peer networks¹⁶

  • Ask clarifying questions during medical appointments¹⁷

Physiological Effects

The stress response triggered by RSD isn't just uncomfortable, it has measurable impacts on fertility. Chronic activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis can:

  • Disrupt reproductive hormones¹⁸

  • Impair implantation rates¹⁹

  • Reduce treatment success rates²⁰

  • Compromise immune function needed for pregnancy²¹

How to Recognise RSD in Your IVF Journey

You might be experiencing RSD if you notice:

Emotional patterns:

  • Feeling crushed by routine clinical feedback that others might brush off

  • Experiencing shame spirals after appointments ("I'm broken," "I'm failing")

  • Difficulty regulating emotions for hours or days after perceived rejection

Cognitive patterns:

  • Rehashing conversations or test results obsessively

  • Mind-reading negative intentions in neutral medical communications

  • All-or-nothing thinking about treatment outcomes

Behavioural patterns:

  • Avoiding support groups for fear of judgment or comparison

  • Difficulty asking questions or advocating for needs

  • Withdrawing from friends or family during treatment

  • Procrastinating on treatment decisions due to fear of "wrong" choices

Physical patterns:

  • Intense physical reactions to medical feedback (racing heart, nausea, trembling)

  • Sleep disruption after appointments

  • Chronic muscle tension or headaches during treatment cycles

Evidence-Based Strategies to Soften the Sting

Immediate Coping Tools

Grounding and regulation:

  • The 5-4-3-2-1 technique: Name 5 things you see, 4 you can touch, 3 you hear, 2 you smell, 1 you taste²²

  • Box breathing: 4 counts in, hold for 4, out for 4, hold for 4²³

  • Ice cold water on wrists or face to activate the vagus nerve²⁴

Cognitive strategies:

  • Fact vs. interpretation journaling: Write "what was actually said" versus "what I heard/felt"²⁵

  • The 10-10-10 rule: Will this matter in 10 minutes, 10 months, 10 years?²⁶

  • Self-compassion breaks: Treat yourself with the same kindness you'd show a good friend²⁷

Preparation and Advocacy

Appointment prep:

  • Script questions in advance to reduce cognitive load during emotional moments

  • Bring a support person or advocate when possible²⁸

  • Request written summaries of medical information

  • Ask for a few minutes to process information before making decisions

Boundary setting:

  • Limit social media exposure during vulnerable treatment phases²⁹

  • Create scripts for well-meaning but triggering comments ("Thanks for caring. I'll let you know if I want to talk about it")

  • Establish "safe spaces" and "challenge spaces" in your life³⁰

Therapeutic Interventions

Trauma-informed approaches:

  • EMDR (Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing): Particularly effective for processing medical trauma and rejection wounds³¹

  • Somatic therapy: Helps regulate the nervous system response to perceived rejection³²

  • Internal Family Systems (IFS) and Resource Therapy: Addresses different "parts" that may carry rejection wounds³³ and different “resources” that may have a greater capacity to copy

Cognitive-behavioural approaches:

  • Dialectical Behaviour Therapy (DBT): Teaches distress tolerance and emotion regulation skills³⁴

  • Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT): Helps develop psychological flexibility around difficult emotions³⁵

  • Schema therapy: Targets core beliefs about rejection and inadequacy³⁶

Medication Considerations During Fertility Treatment

For some people, RSD symptoms are severe enough to require medication support. However, fertility treatment adds complexity to medication decisions:

Alpha-2 agonists are the most commonly prescribed medications for RSD:

  • Clonidine and guanfacine show response rates of 30% individually, with 55-60% effectiveness when tried sequentially³⁷

  • These work by strengthening norepinephrine signalling in the prefrontal cortex, improving emotional regulation³⁸

Safety considerations during fertility treatment:

  • Guanfacine appears safer for conception: FDA pregnancy Category B (versus clonidine's Category C)³⁹

  • Limited human pregnancy data: One small study of 30 guanfacine-exposed pregnancies showed no birth defects⁴⁰

  • Clonidine concerns: Can cross the placenta and potentially cause fetal bradycardia⁴¹

Key medication facts:

  • Guanfacine: typically 1-7mg daily, once-daily dosing, 10-30 hour half-life⁴²

  • Clonidine: 0.1-0.5mg daily, multiple doses needed, 6-12 hour half-life⁴³

  • Both require 2-5 weeks to show full effects and need careful tapering when discontinued⁴⁴

Alternative medication approaches:

  • SSRIs (like sertraline) offer more pregnancy data, though with moderate RSD benefits⁴⁵

  • Bupropion (Category B) may help both ADHD symptoms and emotional regulation⁴⁶

The safest first-line approach for fertility patients combines therapy with lifestyle interventions, with medications reserved for severe cases and chosen in consultation with reproductive psychiatrists⁴⁷.

Peer Support and Community

Research consistently shows that peer support improves both emotional wellbeing and treatment outcomes in fertility patients⁴⁸. Consider:

  • Neurodivergent-specific support groups: These provide understanding of both fertility struggles and neurological differences

  • Online communities: Can feel safer for those with social anxiety

  • Mentorship programs: Connecting with others who've navigated similar challenges

How Clinics Can Better Support Patients with RSD

Healthcare providers play a crucial role in either triggering or soothing RSD responses. Trauma-informed, neurodivergent-affirming care principles include:

Communication Strategies

  • Lead with validation: "I can see this is really difficult news to receive"

  • Avoid minimising language: Replace "don't worry" with "it's understandable that you're concerned"

  • Provide context: "This result is common and doesn't reflect your worth as a person"

  • Offer hope balanced with realism: "While this cycle didn't work, we have several other options to explore"

Environmental Modifications

  • Sensory accommodations: Dimmed lights, reduced noise, comfortable seating⁴⁹

  • Processing time: Build in pauses during difficult conversations

  • Written materials: Provide summaries of verbal information

  • Support person inclusion: Welcome advocates in appointments when requested

Procedural Adaptations

  • Flexible scheduling: Accommodate executive function and emotional regulation needs

  • Clear communication: Avoid medical jargon; explain procedures step-by-step

  • Emotional check-ins: "How are you feeling about what we've discussed so far?"

  • Follow-up protocols: Check in after delivering difficult news

The Neuroscience of Hope: Why This Matters

Understanding RSD through a neuroscientific lens offers hope. The same neuroplasticity that allows RSD patterns to develop also allows them to change⁵⁰. Research on neuroplasticity shows that:

  • Repeated positive experiences can rewire threat-detection systems⁵¹

  • Mindfulness practices physically change brain structure in areas related to emotional regulation⁵²

  • Secure attachment experiences (including therapeutic relationships) can heal rejection wounds⁵³

  • Self-compassion training reduces activity in the brain's self-criticism networks⁵⁴

This means that while you may always have a sensitive nervous system, you can develop resilience and regulation skills that make the IVF journey more manageable.

Final Thoughts

If IVF feels especially brutal, it might not be because you're "too sensitive", it might be because your nervous system is wired to register rejection like an alarm bell. That's not a flaw; it's a feature of a brain that's been shaped by evolution and experience to be highly attuned to social connection.

The good news? With the right tools, support, and advocacy, RSD doesn't have to run the show. You deserve compassion, from yourself and your clinic, as you walk this exhausting, hope-soaked road toward building your family.

Remember: Your sensitivity, while challenging, may also be a source of strength. Many people with RSD are also highly empathetic, creative, and deeply caring. These same qualities that make rejection hurt more can also make joy, connection, and eventual parenthood feel more profound.

References

  1. Dodson, W. (2022). Rejection sensitive dysphoria: How to treat it alongside ADHD. ADDitude Magazine.

  2. Dodson, W. W. (2005). Pharmacotherapy of adult ADHD. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61(5), 589-606.

  3. Silk, J. S., et al. (2012). The role of the brain in social rejection sensitivity. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(11), 1707-1715.

  4. Eisenberger, N. I., & Lieberman, M. D. (2004). Why rejection hurts: A common neural alarm system for physical and social pain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(7), 294-300.

  5. Smart, C., et al. (2020). Social rejection experiences in fertility treatment: A qualitative analysis. Human Reproduction, 35(4), 892-901.

  6. Greil, A. L., et al. (2010). The experience of infertility: A review of recent literature. Sociology of Health & Illness, 32(1), 140-162.

  7. Greil, A. L., et al. (2011). Race-ethnicity and medical services for infertility. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 52(4), 493-509.

  8. Crane, L., et al. (2019). Experiences of autism diagnosis: A survey of over 1000 parents in the United Kingdom. Autism, 23(1), 153-162.

  9. Rooney, K. L., & Domar, A. D. (2018). The relationship between stress and infertility. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 20(1), 41-47.

  10. Downey, G., & Feldman, S. I. (1996). Implications of rejection sensitivity for intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(6), 1327-1343.

  11. Gameiro, S., et al. (2012). ESHRE guideline: Routine psychosocial care in infertility and medically assisted reproduction. Human Reproduction, 27(12), 3441-3453.

  12. Dekel, S., et al. (2019). Post-traumatic stress in couples undergoing fertility treatments. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 37(2), 161-171.

  13. Peterson, B. D., et al. (2003). Marital benefit and coping strategies in men and women undergoing unsuccessful fertility treatments over a 5-year period. Fertility and Sterility, 80(2), 394-403.

  14. Aarts, J. W., et al. (2011). Relationship between quality of life and distress in infertility: A validation study of the Dutch FertiQoL. Human Reproduction, 26(5), 1112-1118.

  15. Bortoletto, P., et al. (2017). Psychological morbidity in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 34(3), 287-295.

  16. Domar, A. D., et al. (2000). The psychological impact of infertility: A comparison with patients with other medical conditions. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology, 21(4), 245-252.

  17. Stewart, M., et al. (2000). The impact of patient-centered care on outcomes. Journal of Family Practice, 49(9), 796-804.

  18. Louis, G. M., et al. (2011). Stress reduces conception probabilities across the fertile window. Fertility and Sterility, 95(7), 2184-2189.

  19. Klonoff-Cohen, H., et al. (2001). Effects of female and male smoking on success rates of IVF and GIFT. Human Reproduction, 16(7), 1382-1390.

  20. Demyttenaere, K., et al. (1998). Coping style and depression level influence outcome in in vitro fertilization. Fertility and Sterility, 69(6), 1026-1033.

  21. Schenker, J. G., et al. (1992). Stress and human reproduction. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 45(1), 1-8.

  22. Stein, D. J. (2006). Evidence-based treatment of anxiety disorders. CNS Spectrums, 11(12), 96-106.

  23. Zaccaro, A., et al. (2018). How breath-control can change your life: A systematic review on psycho-physiological correlates of slow breathing. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12, 353.

  24. Porges, S. W. (2011). The polyvagal theory: Neurophysiological foundations of emotions, attachment, communication, and self-regulation. W. W. Norton.

  25. Beck, A. T., et al. (1979). Cognitive therapy of depression. Guilford Press.

  26. Welch, S. (2009). 10-10-10: A life-transforming idea. Scribner.

  27. Neff, K. D. (2003). Self-compassion: An alternative conceptualization of a healthy attitude toward oneself. Self and Identity, 2(2), 85-101.

  28. Epstein, R. M., et al. (2010). Patient-centered communication and diagnostic testing. Annals of Family Medicine, 8(5), 410-417.

  29. Sheldon, K. M., et al. (2011). Providing choice over topics enhances the positive effects of writing activities. British Journal of Health Psychology, 16(1), 17-32.

  30. Brown, B. (2018). Dare to lead: Brave work, tough conversations, whole hearts. Random House.

  31. Van der Kolk, B. A., et al. (2007). A randomized clinical trial of EMDR, fluoxetine, and pill placebo in the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 68(1), 37-46.

  32. Levine, P. A. (2010). In an unspoken voice: How the body releases trauma and restores goodness. North Atlantic Books.

  33. Schwartz, R. C. (2001). Introduction to the internal family systems model. Trailheads Publications.

  34. Linehan, M. M. (2014). DBT skills training manual. Guilford Press.

  35. Hayes, S. C., et al. (2006). Acceptance and commitment therapy: An experiential approach to behavior change. Guilford Press.

  36. Young, J. E., et al. (2003). Schema therapy: A practitioner's guide. Guilford Press.

  37. Dodson, W. (2022). Alpha-2 agonists for rejection sensitive dysphoria: Clinical response rates. ADDitude Magazine Clinical Review.

  38. Arnsten, A. F. (2013). The neurobiology of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Biological Psychiatry, 73(12), 1182-1190.

  39. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2023). Pregnancy categories for guanfacine and clonidine. FDA Drug Safety Database.

  40. Huybrechts, K. F., et al. (2021). Guanfacine use during pregnancy and risk of birth defects. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 30(8), 1045-1052.

  41. Drugs.com. (2024). Clonidine pregnancy and breastfeeding warnings. Drug Information Database.

  42. American Academy of Family Physicians. (2011). Guanfacine (Intuniv) for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. American Family Physician, 83(4), 468-474.

  43. Psychscenehub. (2024). Psychopharmacology and clinical application of guanfacine and clonidine for ADHD. Clinical Psychology Review.

  44. The Carlat Report. (2021). A closer look at alpha-2 agonists for ADHD. Psychiatric Treatment Guidelines, 19(3), 1-6.

  45. Yonkers, K. A., et al. (2009). The management of depression during pregnancy. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 114(3), 703-713.

  46. Alwan, S., et al. (2010). Use of selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors in pregnancy and the risk of birth defects. New England Journal of Medicine, 363(24), 2399-2411.

  47. Greater Boston Behavioral Health. (2024). Evidence-based treatment approaches for rejection sensitive dysphoria during fertility care. Clinical Practice Guidelines.

  48. Ockhuijsen, H. D., et al. (2014). The impact of a group counselling intervention on women's well-being and pregnancy rates during IVF treatment. Human Reproduction, 29(10), 2302-2342.

  49. Bogdashina, O. (2016). Sensory perceptual issues in autism and Asperger syndrome. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

  50. Doidge, N. (2007). The brain that changes itself. Viking.

  51. Davidson, R. J., & Lutz, A. (2008). Buddha's brain: Neuroplasticity and meditation. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 25(6), 176-188.

  52. Hölzel, B. K., et al. (2011). Mindfulness practice leads to increases in regional brain gray matter density. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 191(1), 36-43.

  53. Cozolino, L. (2014). The neuroscience of human relationships. W. W. Norton.

  54. Leary, M. R., et al. (2007). Self-compassion and reactions to unpleasant self-relevant events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(5), 887-904.

Liz Bancroft is uniquely positioned to speak on the intersection of trauma, neurodivergence, and infertility. She is a registered counselling psychologist with over 14 years of clinical experience, including advanced training in EMDR, DBT, Schema Therapy, and trauma-informed care. She has worked extensively in both public health and private practice settings, supporting individuals with complex trauma, neurodevelopmental differences, and reproductive mental health concerns.
Her professional expertise is further informed by her lived experience: Liz is a late-diagnosed autistic woman and a mother who conceived through IVF. Her dual perspective—as a clinician and patient—allows her to see firsthand the gaps in fertility care that disproportionately impact neurodivergent individuals. She is the founder of Hope Affirm Thrive, a neurodivergent-friendly IVF coaching program designed to provide emotional regulation tools and advocacy support for women navigating fertility treatment.
Through her clinical practice, public speaking, and personal storytelling, Liz advocates for a more inclusive and psychologically safe fertility landscape.

Elizabeth Bancroft

Liz Bancroft is uniquely positioned to speak on the intersection of trauma, neurodivergence, and infertility. She is a registered counselling psychologist with over 14 years of clinical experience, including advanced training in EMDR, DBT, Schema Therapy, and trauma-informed care. She has worked extensively in both public health and private practice settings, supporting individuals with complex trauma, neurodevelopmental differences, and reproductive mental health concerns. Her professional expertise is further informed by her lived experience: Liz is a late-diagnosed autistic woman and a mother who conceived through IVF. Her dual perspective—as a clinician and patient—allows her to see firsthand the gaps in fertility care that disproportionately impact neurodivergent individuals. She is the founder of Hope Affirm Thrive, a neurodivergent-friendly IVF coaching program designed to provide emotional regulation tools and advocacy support for women navigating fertility treatment. Through her clinical practice, public speaking, and personal storytelling, Liz advocates for a more inclusive and psychologically safe fertility landscape.

LinkedIn logo icon
Instagram logo icon
Youtube logo icon
Back to Blog